According to the versions of the openssl packages installed, the EulerOS Virtualization installation on the remote host is affected by the following vulnerabilities :

  - There is a carry propagation bug in the MIPS32 and MIPS64 squaring procedure. Many EC algorithms are     affected, including some of the TLS 1.3 default curves. Impact was not analyzed in detail, because the     pre-requisites for attack are considered unlikely and include reusing private keys. Analysis suggests that     attacks against RSA and DSA as a result of this defect would be very difficult to perform and are not     believed likely. Attacks against DH are considered just feasible (although very difficult) because most of     the work necessary to deduce information about a private key may be performed offline. The amount of     resources required for such an attack would be significant. However, for an attack on TLS to be     meaningful, the server would have to share the DH private key among multiple clients, which is no longer     an option since CVE-2016-0701. This issue affects OpenSSL versions 1.0.2, 1.1.1 and 3.0.0. It was     addressed in the releases of 1.1.1m and 3.0.1 on the 15th of December 2021. For the 1.0.2 release it is     addressed in git commit 6fc1aaaf3 that is available to premium support customers only. It will be made     available in 1.0.2zc when it is released. The issue only affects OpenSSL on MIPS platforms. Fixed in     OpenSSL 3.0.1 (Affected 3.0.0). Fixed in OpenSSL 1.1.1m (Affected 1.1.1-1.1.1l). Fixed in OpenSSL 1.0.2zc-     dev (Affected 1.0.2-1.0.2zb). (CVE-2021-4160)

  - The BN_mod_sqrt() function, which computes a modular square root, contains a bug that can cause it to loop     forever for non-prime moduli. Internally this function is used when parsing certificates that contain     elliptic curve public keys in compressed form or explicit elliptic curve parameters with a base point     encoded in compressed form. It is possible to trigger the infinite loop by crafting a certificate that has     invalid explicit curve parameters. Since certificate parsing happens prior to verification of the     certificate signature, any process that parses an externally supplied certificate may thus be subject to a     denial of service attack. The infinite loop can also be reached when parsing crafted private keys as they     can contain explicit elliptic curve parameters. Thus vulnerable situations include: - TLS clients     consuming server certificates - TLS servers consuming client certificates - Hosting providers taking     certificates or private keys from customers - Certificate authorities parsing certification requests from     subscribers - Anything else which parses ASN.1 elliptic curve parameters Also any other applications that     use the BN_mod_sqrt() where the attacker can control the parameter values are vulnerable to this DoS     issue. In the OpenSSL 1.0.2 version the public key is not parsed during initial parsing of the certificate     which makes it slightly harder to trigger the infinite loop. However any operation which requires the     public key from the certificate will trigger the infinite loop. In particular the attacker can use a self-     signed certificate to trigger the loop during verification of the certificate signature. This issue     affects OpenSSL versions 1.0.2, 1.1.1 and 3.0. It was addressed in the releases of 1.1.1n and 3.0.2 on the     15th March 2022. Fixed in OpenSSL 3.0.2 (Affected 3.0.0,3.0.1). Fixed in OpenSSL 1.1.1n (Affected     1.1.1-1.1.1m). Fixed in OpenSSL 1.0.2zd (Affected 1.0.2-1.0.2zc). (CVE-2022-0778)

Note that Tenable Network Security has extracted the preceding description block directly from the EulerOS security advisory. Tenable has attempted to automatically clean and format it as much as possible without introducing additional issues.

An update of the nxtgn package has been released.

The Linux/Unix host has one or more packages installed that are impacted by a vulnerability without a vendor supplied patch available.

  - There is a carry propagation bug in the MIPS32 and MIPS64 squaring procedure. Many EC algorithms are     affected, including some of the TLS 1.3 default curves. Impact was not analyzed in detail, because the     pre-requisites for attack are considered unlikely and include reusing private keys. Analysis suggests that     attacks against RSA and DSA as a result of this defect would be very difficult to perform and are not     believed likely. Attacks against DH are considered just feasible (although very difficult) because most of     the work necessary to deduce information about a private key may be performed offline. The amount of     resources required for such an attack would be significant. However, for an attack on TLS to be     meaningful, the server would have to share the DH private key among multiple clients, which is no longer     an option since CVE-2016-0701. This issue affects OpenSSL versions 1.0.2, 1.1.1 and 3.0.0. It was     addressed in the releases of 1.1.1m and 3.0.1 on the 15th of December 2021. For the 1.0.2 release it is     addressed in git commit 6fc1aaaf3 that is available to premium support customers only. It will be made     available in 1.0.2zc when it is released. The issue only affects OpenSSL on MIPS platforms. Fixed in     OpenSSL 3.0.1 (Affected 3.0.0). Fixed in OpenSSL 1.1.1m (Affected 1.1.1-1.1.1l). Fixed in OpenSSL 1.0.2zc-     dev (Affected 1.0.2-1.0.2zb). (CVE-2021-4160)

Note that Nessus relies on the presence of the package as reported by the vendor.

According to the versions of the openssl packages installed, the EulerOS installation on the remote host is affected by the following vulnerabilities :

  - There is a carry propagation bug in the MIPS32 and MIPS64 squaring procedure. Many EC algorithms are     affected, including some of the TLS 1.3 default curves. Impact was not analyzed in detail, because the     pre-requisites for attack are considered unlikely and include reusing private keys. Analysis suggests that     attacks against RSA and DSA as a result of this defect would be very difficult to perform and are not     believed likely. Attacks against DH are considered just feasible (although very difficult) because most of     the work necessary to deduce information about a private key may be performed offline. The amount of     resources required for such an attack would be significant. However, for an attack on TLS to be     meaningful, the server would have to share the DH private key among multiple clients, which is no longer     an option since CVE-2016-0701. This issue affects OpenSSL versions 1.0.2, 1.1.1 and 3.0.0. It was     addressed in the releases of 1.1.1m and 3.0.1 on the 15th of December 2021. For the 1.0.2 release it is     addressed in git commit 6fc1aaaf3 that is available to premium support customers only. It will be made     available in 1.0.2zc when it is released. The issue only affects OpenSSL on MIPS platforms. Fixed in     OpenSSL 3.0.1 (Affected 3.0.0). Fixed in OpenSSL 1.1.1m (Affected 1.1.1-1.1.1l). Fixed in OpenSSL 1.0.2zc-     dev (Affected 1.0.2-1.0.2zb). (CVE-2021-4160)

Note that Tenable Network Security has extracted the preceding description block directly from the EulerOS security advisory. Tenable has attempted to automatically clean and format it as much as possible without introducing additional issues.

The remote Debian 10 / 11 host has packages installed that are affected by multiple vulnerabilities as referenced in the dsa-5103 advisory.

    Tavis Ormandy discovered that the BN_mod_sqrt() function of OpenSSL could be tricked into an infinite     loop. This could result in denial of service via malformed certificates. Additional details can be found     in the upstream advisory: https://www.openssl.org/news/secadv/20220315.txt In addition this update     corrects a carry propagation bug specific to MIPS architectures. For the oldstable distribution (buster),     this problem has been fixed in version 1.1.1d-0+deb10u8. For the stable distribution (bullseye), this     problem has been fixed in version 1.1.1k-1+deb11u2. We recommend that you upgrade your openssl packages.
    For the detailed security status of openssl please refer to its security tracker page at:
    https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/openssl

Tenable has extracted the preceding description block directly from the Debian security advisory.

Note that Nessus has not tested for these issues but has instead relied only on the application's self-reported version number.

The version of IBM Cognos Analytics installed on the remote host is affected by multiple vulnerabilities, including the following:

  - OpenSSL is vulnerable to a buffer overflow, caused by improper bounds checking by the EVP_PKEY_decrypt()     function within implementation of the SM2 decryption. By sending specially crafted SM2 content, a remote     attacker could overflow a buffer and execute arbitrary code on the system or cause the application to     crash. (CVE-2021-3711)

  - Async could allow a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code on the system, caused by prototype pollution     in the mapValues() method. By persuading a victim to open a specially-crafted file, an attacker could     exploit this vulnerability to execute arbitrary code on the system.
    (CVE-2021-43138)

  - Apache Commons IO could allow a remote attacker to traverse directories on the system, caused by improper     input validation by the FileNameUtils.normalize method. An attacker could send a specially-crafted URL     request containing 'dot dot' sequences (/../) to view arbitrary files on the system.
    (CVE-2021-29425)

Note that Nessus has not tested for these issues but has instead relied only on the application's self-reported version number.

远程主机上安装的 OpenSSL 版本低于 1.0.2zc-dev。因此，其会受到 1.0.2zc-dev 公告中提及的一个漏洞影响。

  - 在 MIPS32 和 MIPS64 平方运算过程中存在一个进位传送缺陷。许多 EC 算法都会受到影响，包括一些 TLS 1.3 默认曲线。未详细分析影响，因为无法满足攻击的先决条件，并且涉及重复使用私钥。分析检测结果后发现，针对 RSA 和 DSA 的攻击难以执行，且可能性不高。由于推断私钥信息所需的大部分工作都可离线执行，针对 DH 的攻击则视为可行（尽管很难）。此类攻击所需的资源量极大。但是，若要成功对 TLS 发动攻击，服务器必须在多个客户端之间共享 DH 私钥（自 CVE-2016-0701 版本以来已无此选项）。OpenSSL 版本 1.0.2、1.1.1 和 3.0.0 会受此问题影响。2021 年 12 月 15 日发布的 1.1.1m 和 3.0.1 版本已解决此问题。对于 1.0.2 版本，此问题已在仅提供给高级支持客户的 git commit 6fc1aaaf3 中得到解决。git commit 6fc1aaaf3 将在发布 1.0.2zc 时予以提供。此问题仅影响 MIPS 平台上的 OpenSSL。已在 OpenSSL 3.0.1 中修复（影响 3.0.0）。已在 OpenSSL 1.1.1m 中修复（影响 1.1.1-1.1.1l）。已在 OpenSSL 1.0.2zc-dev 中修复（影响 1.0.2-1.0.2zb）。(CVE-2021-4160)

请注意，Nessus 尚未测试此问题，而是只依靠应用程序自我报告的版本号来判断。

远程主机上安装的 Nessus Network Monitor (NNM) 版本低于 6.0.1。因此，其会受到第三方软件中的多个漏洞影响。

  请注意，Nessus 尚未测试此问题，而是只依据应用程序自我报告的版本号进行判断。

远程主机受到 GLSA-202210-02 中所述漏洞的影响（OpenSSL：多个漏洞）

  - Raccoon 攻击利用 TLS 规范中的一个缺陷，使攻击者能够计算使用基于 Diffie-Hellman (DH) 的密码套件的连接中的预主密钥。在这种情况下，这将导致攻击者能够窃听通过该 TLS 连接发送的所有加密通信。只有在实现重新使用跨多个 TLS 连接的 DH 机密时，攻击者才能利用此攻击。请注意，此问题仅影响 DH 加密套件，不会影响 ECDH 加密套件。
    此问题影响 OpenSSL 1.0.2，该版本已不受支持，且无法再接收公共更新。OpenSSL 1.1.1 不受此问题影响。已在 OpenSSL 1.0.2w 中修复（影响 1.0.2-1.0.2v）。(CVE-2020-1968)

  - 为了解密 SM2 加密的数据，应用程序应调用 API 函数 EVP_PKEY_decrypt()。通常，应用程序将会调用此函数两次。第一次：输入时，out 参数可以是 NULL，退出时，outlen 参数会填充保存解密后明文的缓冲区大小。然后，应用程序会分配大小充足的缓冲区，并再次调用 EVP_PKEY_decrypt()，但这次会为 out 参数传递非空值。SM2 解密代码的实现中存在一个错误，这意味着用于保存 EVP_PKEY_decrypt() 首次调用所返回明文的缓冲区大小的计算值可能小于第二次调用所需的实际大小。当应用程序通过过小的缓冲区第二次调用 EVP_PKEY_decrypt() 时，将会导致缓冲区溢出。能够向应用程序展示用于解密的 SM2 内容的恶意攻击者可使攻击者选择的数据溢出缓冲区多达 62 个字节，这会改变缓冲区之后保存的其他数据内容，从而可能改变应用程序行为或造成应用程序崩溃。缓冲区的位置取决于应用程序，但通常是在堆中分配。已在 OpenSSL 1.1.1l 中修复（影响 1.1.1-1.1.1k）。
    (CVE-2021-3711)

  - ASN.1 字符串在 OpenSSL 内表示为 ASN1_STRING 结构，该结构包含一个保存字符串数据的缓冲区和一个保存缓冲区长度的字段。此字符串与普通 C 字符串形成对比，后者表示为字符串数据的缓冲区，以 NUL(0) 字节结束。虽然不是严格要求，但使用 OpenSSL 的独有 d2i 函数（及其他类似解析函数）解析的 ASN.1 字符串，以及使用 ASN1_STRING_set() 函数设定值的任何字符串，都将额外使用 NUL 方式终止 ASN1_STRING 结构中的字节数组。但是，应用程序可能会直接构建有效的 ASN1_STRING 结构，该结构不会直接在 ASN1_STRING 数组中设置数据和长度字段，进而使用 NUL 终止字节数组。这种情况也会因使用 ASN1_STRING_set0() 函数发生。已经发现，打印 ASN.1 数据的多个 OpenSSL 函数均假设 ASN1_STRING 字节数组将使用 NUL 终止，但无法保证直接构建的字符串亦是如此。当应用程序请求打印 ASN.1 结构时，并且 ASN.1 结构包含由应用程序直接构建但并非使用 NUL 终止的 ASN1_STRING 时，将会出现读取缓冲区溢出。同样的情况也会在处理证书的名称限制期间出现（例如，证书直接由应用程序构建，而非通过 OpenSSL 解析函数加载，以及证书包含非 NUL 终止的 ASN1_STRING 结构）。这种情况也会出现在 X509_get1_email()、X509_REQ_get1_email() 和 X509_get1_ocsp() 函数中。如果恶意执行者使应用程序直接构建 ASN1_STRING，然后通过某个受影响的 OpenSSL 函数处理该字符串，此问题也会出现。此问题可能会导致崩溃（导致拒绝服务攻击）。
    该问题还可能导致私有内存内容（例如私钥或敏感纯文本）泄露。已在 OpenSSL 1.1.1l 中修复（影响 1.1.1-1.1.1k）。已在 OpenSSL 1.0.2za (Affected 1.0.2-1.0.2y) 中修复。(CVE-2021-3712)

  - 在 MIPS32 和 MIPS64 平方运算过程中存在一个进位传送缺陷。许多 EC 算法都会受到影响，包括一些 TLS 1.3 默认曲线。未详细分析影响，因为无法满足攻击的先决条件，并且涉及重复使用私钥。分析检测结果后发现，针对 RSA 和 DSA 的攻击难以执行，且可能性不高。由于推断私钥信息所需的大部分工作都可离线执行，针对 DH 的攻击则视为可行（尽管很难）。此类攻击所需的资源量极大。但是，若要成功对 TLS 发动攻击，服务器必须在多个客户端之间共享 DH 私钥（自 CVE-2016-0701 版本以来已无此选项）。OpenSSL 版本 1.0.2、1.1.1 和 3.0.0 会受此问题影响。2021 年 12 月 15 日发布的 1.1.1m 和 3.0.1 版本已解决此问题。对于 1.0.2 版本，此问题已在仅提供给高级支持客户的 git commit 6fc1aaaf3 中得到解决。git commit 6fc1aaaf3 将在发布 1.0.2zc 时予以提供。此问题仅影响 MIPS 平台上的 OpenSSL。已在 OpenSSL 3.0.1 中修复（影响 3.0.0）。已在 OpenSSL 1.1.1m 中修复（影响 1.1.1-1.1.1l）。已在 OpenSSL 1.0.2zc-dev 中修复（影响 1.0.2-1.0.2zb）。(CVE-2021-4160)

  - 用于计算模平方根的 BN_mod_sqrt() 函数中包含一个缺陷，可导致其无限循环非质数模数。当在内部解析包含压缩形式的椭圆曲线公钥或具有以压缩形式编码的基点的显式椭圆曲线参数时，将会使用此函数。可以通过构建具有无效显式曲线参数的证书来触发无限循环。由于证书解析发生在证书签名验证之前，因此任何解析外部所提供证书的进程都可能遭受拒绝服务攻击。解析构建的私钥时也可能发生无限循环，因为其中可能包含显式椭圆曲线参数。因此，易受攻击的情况包括：- TLS 客户端使用服务器证书 - TLS 服务器使用客户端证书 - 从客户处获取证书或私钥的主机托管商 - 证书颁发机构解析用户的证书请求 - 解析 ASN.1 椭圆曲线参数以及使用 BN_mod_sqrt( ) 的任何其他应用程序，其中攻击者可控制易受此 DoS 问题影响的参数值。OpenSSL 1.0.2 版本在初始解析证书期间未解析公钥，这就使得触发无限循环变得稍难一些。但是，任何需要证书公钥的操作都将触发无限循环。特别是在证书签名验证期间，攻击者可使用自签名证书触发循环。OpenSSL 版本 1.0.2、1.1.1 和 3.0 会受此问题影响。2022 年 3 月 15 日发布的 1.1.1n 和 3.0.2 版本已解决此问题。已在 OpenSSL 3.0.2 中修复（影响 3.0.0、3.0.1）。已在 OpenSSL 1.1.1n 中修复（影响 1.1.1-1.1.1m）。已在 OpenSSL 1.0.2zd 中修复（影响 1.0.2-1.0.2zc）。(CVE-2022-0778)

  - c_rehash 脚本未正确审查 shell 元字符以防止命令注入。某些操作系统以自动执行的方式分发此脚本。在此类操作系统中，攻击者可以使用脚本的权限执行任意命令。使用 c_rehash 脚本被视为过时，应由 OpenSSL rehash 命令行工具取代。
    已在 OpenSSL 3.0.3 中修复（影响 3.0.0、3.0.1、3.0.2）。已在 OpenSSL 1.1.1o 中修复（影响 1.1.1-1.1.1n）。
    已在 OpenSSL 1.0.2ze 中修复（影响 1.0.2-1.0.2zd）。(CVE-2022-1292)

  - 用于清空哈希表的 OPENSSL_LH_flush() 函数包含一个缺陷，该缺陷会破坏被删除的哈希表条目占用的内存的重用。解码证书或密钥时使用此函数。如果长期限进程定期解码证书或密钥，其内存使用量将无限制地扩展，并且该进程可能被操作系统终止，从而导致拒绝服务。
    遍历空哈希表条目也将花费越来越多的时间。通常，此类长期限进程可能是配置为接受客户端证书认证的 TLS 客户端或 TLS 服务器。OpenSSL 3.0 版本中添加了该函数，因此较早的版本不受此问题的影响。已在 OpenSSL 3.0.3 中修复（影响 3.0.0、3.0.1、3.0.2）。(CVE-2022-1473)

  - 在某些情况下，使用 AES-NI 汇编优化实现的 32 位 x86 平台的 AES OCB 模式不会加密整个数据。这可能会显示内存中预先存在但未写入的 16 个字节数据。在就地加密的特殊情况下，将显示 16 个字节的纯文本。由于 OpenSSL 不支持用于 TLS 和 DTLS 的基于 OCB 的加密套件，因此它们都不会受到影响。已在 OpenSSL 3.0.5 中修复（影响 3.0.0-3.0.4）。在 OpenSSL 1.1.1q 中已修复（影响 1.1.1-1.1.1p）。(CVE-2022-2097)

请注意，Nessus 尚未测试这些问题，而是只依据应用程序自我报告的版本号进行判断。

ID	名前	製品	ファミリー	公開日	更新日	深刻度
163134	EulerOS Virtualization 2.10.0 : openssl (EulerOS-SA-2022-2032)	Nessus	Huawei Local Security Checks	2022/7/14	2022/11/23	medium
163137	EulerOS Virtualization 2.10.1 : openssl (EulerOS-SA-2022-2060)	Nessus	Huawei Local Security Checks	2022/7/14	2022/11/23	medium
204693	Photon OS 3.0: Nxtgn PHSA-2022-3.0-0372	Nessus	PhotonOS Local Security Checks	2024/7/25	2024/7/25	medium
253282	Linux Distros Unpatched Vulnerability : CVE-2021-4160	Nessus	Misc.	2025/8/21	2025/8/21	medium
159774	EulerOS 2.0 SP9 : openssl (EulerOS-SA-2022-1455)	Nessus	Huawei Local Security Checks	2022/4/18	2022/11/23	medium
160645	EulerOS 2.0 SP10 : openssl (EulerOS-SA-2022-1649)	Nessus	Huawei Local Security Checks	2022/5/6	2022/11/23	medium
158979	Debian DSA-5103-1 : openssl - security update	Nessus	Debian Local Security Checks	2022/3/16	2025/1/24	medium
166606	IBM Cognos Analytics Multiple Vulnerabilities (6828527)	Nessus	CGI abuses	2022/10/27	2023/1/5	critical
157231	OpenSSL 1.0.2 < 1.0.2zc-dev 漏洞	Nessus	Web Servers	2022/1/29	2024/10/7	medium
161211	Nessus Network Monitor < 6.0.1 多个漏洞 (TNS-2022-10)	Nessus	Misc.	2022/5/16	2023/10/27	critical
166162	GLSA-202210-02 : OpenSSL：多个漏洞	Nessus	Gentoo Local Security Checks	2022/10/16	2025/8/12	critical

検出

プラグインの検索

medium

medium

medium

medium

medium

medium

medium

critical

medium

critical

critical