Azure Linux 3.0 セキュリティ更新カーネルCVE-2025-37865]
medium Nessus プラグイン ID 295392
Language:
概要
リモートの Azure Linux ホストに 1 つ以上のセキュリティ更新プログラムがありません。説明
リモートの Azure Linux 3.0 ホストにインストールされているカーネルのバージョンは、テスト済みのバージョンより前です。したがって、CVE-2025-37865 のアドバイザリに記載されている脆弱性の影響を受けます。- Linux カーネルでは、以下の脆弱性が解決されています: net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: fix -ENOENT when deleting VLANs and MST is unsupported Russell King reports that on the ZII dev rev B, deleting a bridge VLAN from a user port fails with -ENOENT:
https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/[email protected]/ This comes from mv88e6xxx_port_vlan_leave() -> mv88e6xxx_mst_put(), which tries to find an MST entry in &chip->msts associated with the SID, but fails and returns -ENOENT as such. But we know that this chip does not support MST at all, so that is not surprising. The question is why does the guard in mv88e6xxx_mst_put() not exit early: if (!sid) return 0; And the answer seems to be simple: the sid comes from vlan.sid which supposedly was previously populated by mv88e6xxx_vtu_get(). But some chip->info->ops->vtu_getnext() implementations do not populate vlan.sid, for example see mv88e6185_g1_vtu_getnext(). In that case, later in mv88e6xxx_port_vlan_leave() we are using a garbage sid which is just residual stack memory. Testing for sid == 0 covers all cases of a non-bridge VLAN or a bridge VLAN mapped to the default MSTI. For some chips, SID 0 is valid and installed by mv88e6xxx_stu_setup(). A chip which does not support the STU would implicitly only support mapping all VLANs to the default MSTI, so although SID 0 is not valid, it would be sufficient, if we were to zero-initialize the vlan structure, to fix the bug, due to the coincidence that a test for vlan.sid == 0 already exists and leads to the same (correct) behavior. Another option which would be sufficient would be to add a test for mv88e6xxx_has_stu() inside mv88e6xxx_mst_put(), symmetric to the one which already exists in mv88e6xxx_mst_get(). But that placement means the caller will have to dereference vlan.sid, which means it will access uninitialized memory, which is not nice even if it ignores it later. So we end up making both modifications, in order to not rely just on the sid == 0 coincidence, but also to avoid having uninitialized structure fields which might get temporarily accessed.
(CVE-2025-37865)
Nessus はこの問題をテストしておらず、代わりにアプリケーションが自己報告するバージョン番号にのみ依存していることに注意してください。
ソリューション
影響を受けるパッケージを更新してください。参考資料
プラグインの詳細
深刻度: Medium
ID: 295392
ファイル名: azure_linux_CVE-2025-37865.nasl
バージョン: 1.1
タイプ: local
公開日: 2026/1/22
更新日: 2026/1/22
サポートされているセンサー: Nessus
リスク情報
VPR
リスクファクター: Medium
スコア: 4.4
CVSS v2
リスクファクター: Medium
基本値: 4.6
現状値: 3.4
ベクトル: CVSS2#AV:L/AC:L/Au:S/C:N/I:N/A:C
CVSS スコアのソース: CVE-2025-37865
CVSS v3
リスクファクター: Medium
基本値: 5.5
現状値: 4.8
ベクトル: CVSS:3.0/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
現状ベクトル: CVSS:3.0/E:U/RL:O/RC:C
脆弱性情報
CPE: p-cpe:/a:microsoft:azure_linux:kernel-drivers-intree-amdgpu, p-cpe:/a:microsoft:azure_linux:kernel-drivers-accessibility, p-cpe:/a:microsoft:azure_linux:kernel-tools, p-cpe:/a:microsoft:azure_linux:kernel-debuginfo, p-cpe:/a:microsoft:azure_linux:kernel-devel, p-cpe:/a:microsoft:azure_linux:kernel-drivers-gpu, p-cpe:/a:microsoft:azure_linux:python3-perf, p-cpe:/a:microsoft:azure_linux:kernel-docs, x-cpe:/o:microsoft:azure_linux, p-cpe:/a:microsoft:azure_linux:kernel, p-cpe:/a:microsoft:azure_linux:kernel-drivers-sound, p-cpe:/a:microsoft:azure_linux:bpftool
必要な KB アイテム: Host/local_checks_enabled, Host/AzureLinux/release, Host/AzureLinux/rpm-list, Host/cpu
エクスプロイトの容易さ: No known exploits are available
パッチ公開日: 2025/7/8
脆弱性公開日: 2025/5/5
参照情報
CVE: CVE-2025-37865