リモートの Debian 12 ホストには、dsa-5973 アドバイザリで言及されているように、複数の脆弱性の影響を受けるパッケージがインストールされています。

    - -------------------------------------------------- -------------------------- Debian セキュリティアドバイザリ DSA-5973-1 security@debian.org https://www.debian.org/security/Salvatore Bonaccorso 2025 年 8 月 12 日 https://www.debian.org/security/faq
    - -------------------------------------------------------------------------

    パッケージ: linux CVE ID: CVE-2024-36350 CVE-2024-36357 CVE-2024-36913 CVE-2024-41013 CVE-2024-56758 CVE-2024-57883 CVE-2025-21816 CVE-2025-22119 CVE-2025-27558 CVE-2025-37958 CVE-2025-38000 CVE-2025-38001 CVE-2025-38003 CVE-2025-38004 CVE-2025-38031 CVE-2025-38034 CVE-2025-38035 CVE-2025-38037 CVE-2025-38040 CVE-2025-38043 CVE-2025-38044 CVE-2025-38048 CVE-2025-38051 CVE-2025-38052 CVE-2025-38058 CVE-2025-38061 CVE-2025-38062 CVE-2025-38063 CVE-2025-38065 CVE-2025-38066 CVE-2025-38067 CVE-2025-38068 CVE-2025-38071 CVE-2025-38072 CVE-2025-38074 CVE-2025-38075 CVE-2025-38077 CVE-2025-38078 CVE-2025-38079 CVE-2025-38083 CVE-2025-38084 CVE-2025-38085 CVE-2025-38086 CVE-2025-38088 CVE-2025-38090 CVE-2025-38097 CVE-2025-38100 CVE-2025-38102 CVE-2025-38103 CVE-2025-38107 CVE-2025-38108 CVE-2025-38111 CVE-2025-38112 CVE-2025-38113 CVE-2025-38115 CVE-2025-38118 CVE-2025-38119 CVE-2025-38120 CVE-2025-38122 CVE-2025-38124 CVE-2025-38126 CVE-2025-38131 CVE-2025-38135 CVE-2025-38136 CVE-2025-38138 CVE-2025-38142 CVE-2025-38143 CVE-2025-38145 CVE-2025-38146 CVE-2025-38147 CVE-2025-38148 CVE-2025-38151 CVE-2025-38153 CVE-2025-38154 CVE-2025-38157 CVE-2025-38158 CVE-2025-38159 CVE-2025-38160 CVE-2025-38161 CVE-2025-38163 CVE-2025-38165 CVE-2025-38166 CVE-2025-38167 CVE-2025-38170 CVE-2025-38173 CVE-2025-38174 CVE-2025-38180 CVE-2025-38181 CVE-2025-38183 CVE-2025-38184 CVE-2025-38185 CVE-2025-38190 CVE-2025-38191 CVE-2025-38193 CVE-2025-38194 CVE-2025-38197 CVE-2025-38198 CVE-2025-38200 CVE-2025-38202 CVE-2025-38211 CVE-2025-38212 CVE-2025-38214 CVE-2025-38215 CVE-2025-38218 CVE-2025-38219 CVE-2025-38222 CVE-2025-38225 CVE-2025-38226 CVE-2025-38227 CVE-2025-38229 CVE-2025-38230 CVE-2025-38231 CVE-2025-38236 CVE-2025-38239 CVE-2025-38245 CVE-2025-38249 CVE-2025-38251 CVE-2025-38257 CVE-2025-38259 CVE-2025-38260 CVE-2025-38262 CVE-2025-38263 CVE-2025-38273 CVE-2025-38275 CVE-2025-38277 CVE-2025-38280 CVE-2025-38282 CVE-2025-38285 CVE-2025-38286 CVE-2025-38293 CVE-2025-38298 CVE-2025-38300 CVE-2025-38304 CVE-2025-38305 CVE-2025-38310 CVE-2025-38312 CVE-2025-38313 CVE-2025-38319 CVE-2025-38320 CVE-2025-38323 CVE-2025-38324 CVE-2025-38326 CVE-2025-38328 CVE-2025-38331 CVE-2025-38332 CVE-2025-38334 CVE-2025-38336 CVE-2025-38337 CVE-2025-38342 CVE-2025-38344 CVE-2025-38345 CVE-2025-38346 CVE-2025-38348 CVE-2025-38350 CVE-2025-38352 CVE-2025-38354 CVE-2025-38362 CVE-2025-38363 CVE-2025-38364 CVE-2025-38365 CVE-2025-38371 CVE-2025-38375 CVE-2025-38377 CVE-2025-38380 CVE-2025-38382 CVE-2025-38384 CVE-2025-38385 CVE-2025-38386 CVE-2025-38387 CVE-2025-38389 CVE-2025-38391 CVE-2025-38393 CVE-2025-38395 CVE-2025-38396 CVE-2025-38399 CVE-2025-38400 CVE-2025-38401 CVE-2025-38403 CVE-2025-38404 CVE-2025-38406 CVE-2025-38409 CVE-2025-38410 CVE-2025-38412 CVE-2025-38415 CVE-2025-38416 CVE-2025-38418 CVE-2025-38419 CVE-2025-38420 CVE-2025-38422 CVE-2025-38424 CVE-2025-38425 CVE-2025-38428 CVE-2025-38430 CVE-2025-38437 CVE-2025-38439 CVE-2025-38441 CVE-2025-38443 CVE-2025-38444 CVE-2025-38445 CVE-2025-38448 CVE-2025-38451 CVE-2025-38455 CVE-2025-38456 CVE-2025-38457 CVE-2025-38458 CVE-2025-38459 CVE-2025-38460 CVE-2025-38461 CVE-2025-38462 CVE-2025-38464 CVE-2025-38465 CVE-2025-38466 CVE-2025-38467 CVE-2025-38468 CVE-2025-38470 CVE-2025-38471 CVE-2025-38472 CVE-2025-38473 CVE-2025-38474 CVE-2025-38476 CVE-2025-38477 CVE-2025-38478 CVE-2025-38480 CVE-2025-38481 CVE-2025-38482 CVE-2025-38483 CVE-2025-38485 CVE-2025-38487 CVE-2025-38488 CVE-2025-38494 CVE-2025-38495 CVE-2025-38497 CVE-2025-38498 CVE-2025-38499

    Linux カーネルに、権限昇格、サービス拒否、または情報漏洩を引き起こす可能性がある、複数の脆弱性が発見されました。

    旧安定版oldstableディストリビューションbookword では、これらの問題はバージョン 6.1.147-1で修正されました。

    お使いの linux パッケージをアップグレードすることを推奨します。

    linux の詳細なセキュリティステータスについては、そのセキュリティトラッカーページを参照してください。
    https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/linux

    Debian セキュリティアドバイザリに関する詳細、これらの更新をシステムに適用する方法、およびよくある質問については、こちらを参照してください。https://www.debian.org/security/

    メーリングリスト: debian-security-announce@lists.debian.org

Tenable は、前述の説明ブロックを Debian セキュリティアドバイザリから直接抽出しました。

Nessus はこれらの問題をテストしておらず、代わりにアプリケーションが自己報告するバージョン番号にのみ依存していることに注意してください。

Linux/Unix 主机中安装的一个或多个程序包受到一个漏洞影响，而供应商没有提供补丁程序。

  - jffs2检查是否在写入摘要之前预分配了原始节点。 Syzkaller 在 jffs2_link_node_ref 中检测到内核缺陷这是由 jffs2_prealloc_raw_node_refs 中的错误注入所导致。 jffs2_sum_write_sumnode 不检查 jffs2_prealloc_raw_node_refs 的返回值而只是让错误传播到 jffs2_sum_write_data最终会调用 jffs2_link_node_ref以便将汇总链接到预期分配的节点。 fs/jffs2/nodelist.c:592 处的内核缺陷无效 opcode0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP KASAN NOPTI CPU:1 PID: 31277 Comm: syz-executor.7 Not tainted 6.1.128-syzkaller-00139-ge10f83ca10a1 #0 硬件名称QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996 )、BIOS 1.12.0-1 2014 年 4 月 1 日 RIP
    0010:jffs2_link_node_ref+0x570/0x690 fs/jffs2/nodelist.c:592 调用跟踪 <TASK> jffs2_sum_write_data fs/jffs2/summary.c:841 [inline] jffs2_sum_write_sumnode+0xd1a/0x1da0 fs/jffs2/summary.c:874 jffs2_summary.c:874 jffs2_space+do_reffs2_do_reffs 0xa18/0xd60 fs/jffs2/nodemgmt.c:388 jffs2_reserve_space+0x55f/0xaa0 fs/jffs2/nodemgmt.c:197 jffs2_write_inode_range+0x246/0xb50 fs/jffs2/write.c:362 jffs2_write_end+0x726/0x15jffs/jffs/jffs/ .c:301 generic_perform_write+0x314/0x5d0 mm/filemap.c:3856
    __generic_file_write_iter+0x2ae/0x4d0 mm/filemap.c:3973 generic_file_write_iter+0xe3/0x350 mm/filemap.c:4005 call_write_iter include/linux/fs.h:2265 [inline] do_iter_readv_writev+0x20f/0x3c0 fs/read_write.c:735 do_iter_write +0x186/0x710 fs/read_write.c:861 vfs_iter_write+0x70/0xa0 fs/read_write.c:902 iter_file_splice_write+0x73b/0xc90 fs/splice.c:685 do_splice_from fs/splice.c:763 [inline] direct_splice_actor+0x10c/ 0x170 fs/splice.c:950 splice_direct_to_actor+0x337/0xa10 fs/splice.c:896 do_splice_direct+0x1a9/0x280 fs/splice.c:1002 do_sendfile+0xb13/0x12c0 fs/read_write.c:1255 __do_sys_sendfile64 fs :1323 [inline] __se_sys_sendfile64 fs/read_write.c:1309 [inline] __x64_sys_sendfile64+0x1cf/0x210 fs/read_write.c:1309 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:51 [inline] do_syscall_64+0x35/0x80 arch/ x86/entry/common.c:81 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x6e/0xd8通过在调用 jffs2_sum_write_data 之前检查 jffs2_prealloc_raw_node_refs 的返回值来修复此问题。由 Linux Verification Center (linuxtesting.org) 通过 Syzkaller 发现。 (CVE-2025-38194)

请注意，Nessus 依赖供应商报告的程序包是否存在进行判断。

Linux/Unix ホストには、ベンダーが提供するパッチが利用できない脆弱性の影響を受ける複数のパッケージがインストールされています。

  - jffs2サマリーを書き込む前に生のノードが事前に割り当てられていることを確認します。Syzkaller は、jffs2_prealloc_raw_node_refs の障害インジェクションが原因で、jffs2_link_node_ref にカーネルバグがあることを検出しました。 jffs2_sum_write_sumnode は jffs2_prealloc_raw_node_refs の戻り値をチェックせず、エラーを jffs2_sum_write_data に伝播させます。これは最終的に jffs2_link_node_ref を呼び出し、予想される割り当てノードにサマリーをリンクします。 fs/jffs2/nodelist.c:592! におけるカーネルバグ無効な opcode: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP KASAN NOPTI CPU: 1 PID: 31277 Comm: syz-executor.7 汚染されていない 6.1.128-syzkaller-00139-ge10f83ca10a1 #0 ハードウェア名: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996) 、BIOS 1.12.0-1 2014 年 4 月 1 日 RIP
    0010:jffs2_link_node_ref+0x570/0x690 fs/jffs2/nodelist.c:592 Call Trace: <TASK> jffs2_sum_write_data fs/jffs2/summary.c:841 [inline] jffs2_sum_write_sumnode+0xd1a/0x1da0 fs/jffs2/nodelist.c:874 jffs2/summary.c:874 jffs2/summary.c:874 jffs2/summary.c:841 0xa18/0xd60 fs/jffs2/nodemgmt.c:388 jffs2_reserve_space+0x55f/0xaa0 fs/jffs2/nodemgmt.c:197 jffs2_write_inode_range+0x246/0xb50 fs/jffs2/write.c:362 jffs2_write_end+0x726/0x726/0x726/0x1500 .c:301 generic_perform_write+0x314/0x5d0 mm/filemap.c:3856
    __generic_file_write_iter+0x2ae/0x4d0 mm/filemap.c:3973 generic_file_write_iter+0xe3/0x350 mm/filemap.c:4005 call_write_iter include/linux/fs.h:2265 [inline] do_iter_readv_writev+0x20f/0x3c0 fs/read_write.c:735 do_iter_write +0x186/0x710 fs/read_write.c:861 vfs_iter_write+0x70/0xa0 fs/read_write.c:902 iter_file_splice_write+0x73b/0xc90 fs/splice.c:685 do_splice_from fs/splice.c:763 [inline] direct_splice_actor+0x10c/ 0x170 fs/splice.c:950 splice_direct_to_actor+0x337/0xa10 fs/splice.c:896 do_splice_direct+0x1a9/0x280 fs/splice.c:1002 do_sendfile+0xb13/0x12c0 fs/read_write.c:1255 __do_sys_sendfile64 fs/read_write.c:1255 __do_sys_sendfile64 fs/read :1323 [インライン] __se_sys_sendfile64 fs/read_write.c:1309 [インライン] __x64_sys_sendfile64+0x1cf/0x210 fs/read_write.c:1309 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:51 [インライン] do_syscall_64+0x35/0x80 arch/ x86/entry/common.c:81 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x6e/0xd8 jffs2_sum_write_data を呼び出す前に jffs2_prealloc_raw_node_refs の戻り値をチェックすることでこの問題を修正します。Syzkaller で Linux Verification Center (linuxtesting.org) によって発見されました。(CVE-2025-38194)

Nessus は、ベンダーによって報告されたパッケージの存在に依存していることに注意してください。

Linux/Unix 主機上安裝了一個或多個受到弱點影響的套件，且供應商未提供可用的修補程式。

  - jffs2寫入摘要前檢查是否已預先配置原始節點。Syzkaller 在 jffs2_link_node_ref 中偵測到一個核心錯誤這是因為 jffs2_prealloc_raw_node_refs 中的錯誤插入所致。 jffs2_sum_write_sumnode 不會檢查 jffs2_prealloc_raw_node_refs 的傳回值而只會讓任何錯誤傳播至 jffs2_sum_write_datajffs2_sum_write_data 最終會呼叫 jffs2_link_node_ref 以將摘要連結至預期的配置節點。 fs/jffs2/nodelist.c:592! 的核心錯誤無效 opcode0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP KASAN NOPTI CPU1 PID 31277 Commsyz-executor.7 未受污染的 6.1.128-syzkaller-00139-ge10f83ca10a1 #0 硬體名稱 QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX 1996 )、BIOS 1.12.0-1 04/01/2014 RIP
    0010:jffs2_link_node_ref+0x570/0x690 fs/jffs2/nodelist.c:592 呼叫追踪 <TASK> jffs2_sum_write_data fs/jffs2/summary.c:841 [內嵌] jffs2_sum_write_sumnode+0xd1a/0x1da0 fs/jffs2/summary.c:874 jffs2_do_reservespace_reservespace_ 0xa18/0xd60 fs/jffs2/nodemgmt.c:388 jffs2_reserve_space+0x55f/0xaa0 fs/jffs2/nodemgmt.c:197 jffs2_write_inode_range+0x246/0xb50 fs/jffs2/write.c:362 jffs2_write_end+0xj726//0x15dffs26 .c:301 generic_perform_write+0x314/0x5d0 mm/filemap.c:3856
    __generic_file_write_iter+0x2ae/0x4d0 mm/filemap.c:3973 generic_file_write_iter+0xe3/0x350 mm/filemap.c:4005 call_write_iter include/linux/fs.h:2265 [內嵌] do_iter_readv_writev+0x20f/0x3c0 fs/read_write.c:735 do_iter_write +0x186/0x710 fs/read_write.c:861 vfs_iter_write+0x70/0xa0 fs/read_write.c:902 iter_file_splice_write+0x73b/0xc90 fs/splice.c:685 do_splice_from fs/splice.c:763 [內嵌] direct_splice_actor+0x10c/ 0x170 fs/splice.c:950 splice_direct_to_actor+0x337/0xa10 fs/splice.c:896 do_splice_direct+0x1a9/0x280 fs/splice.c:1002 do_sendfile+0xb13/0x12c0 fs/read_write.c:1255 __do_sys_sendfile64 fs/read_cwrite. :1323 [內嵌] __se_sys_sendfile64 fs/read_write.c:1309 [內嵌] __x64_sys_sendfile64+0x1cf/0x210 fs/read_write.c:1309 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:51 [內嵌] do_syscall_64+0x35/0x80 arch/ x86/entry/common.c:81 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x6e/0xd8 透過在呼叫 jffs2_sum_write_data 之前檢查 jffs2_prealloc_raw_node_refs 的傳回值來修正此問題。由 Linux Verification Center (linuxtesting.org) 的 Syzkaller 發現。 (CVE-2025-38194)

請注意，Nessus 依賴供應商報告的套件存在。

The remote Debian 12 host has packages installed that are affected by multiple vulnerabilities as referenced in the dsa-5973 advisory.

    - -------------------------------------------------------------------------     Debian Security Advisory DSA-5973-1                   security@debian.org     https://www.debian.org/security/                     Salvatore Bonaccorso     August 12, 2025                       https://www.debian.org/security/faq
    - -------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Package        : linux     CVE ID         : CVE-2024-36350 CVE-2024-36357 CVE-2024-36913 CVE-2024-41013                      CVE-2024-56758 CVE-2024-57883 CVE-2025-21816 CVE-2025-22119                      CVE-2025-27558 CVE-2025-37958 CVE-2025-38000 CVE-2025-38001                      CVE-2025-38003 CVE-2025-38004 CVE-2025-38031 CVE-2025-38034                      CVE-2025-38035 CVE-2025-38037 CVE-2025-38040 CVE-2025-38043                      CVE-2025-38044 CVE-2025-38048 CVE-2025-38051 CVE-2025-38052                      CVE-2025-38058 CVE-2025-38061 CVE-2025-38062 CVE-2025-38063                      CVE-2025-38065 CVE-2025-38066 CVE-2025-38067 CVE-2025-38068                      CVE-2025-38071 CVE-2025-38072 CVE-2025-38074 CVE-2025-38075                      CVE-2025-38077 CVE-2025-38078 CVE-2025-38079 CVE-2025-38083                      CVE-2025-38084 CVE-2025-38085 CVE-2025-38086 CVE-2025-38088                      CVE-2025-38090 CVE-2025-38097 CVE-2025-38100 CVE-2025-38102                      CVE-2025-38103 CVE-2025-38107 CVE-2025-38108 CVE-2025-38111                      CVE-2025-38112 CVE-2025-38113 CVE-2025-38115 CVE-2025-38118                      CVE-2025-38119 CVE-2025-38120 CVE-2025-38122 CVE-2025-38124                      CVE-2025-38126 CVE-2025-38131 CVE-2025-38135 CVE-2025-38136                      CVE-2025-38138 CVE-2025-38142 CVE-2025-38143 CVE-2025-38145                      CVE-2025-38146 CVE-2025-38147 CVE-2025-38148 CVE-2025-38151                      CVE-2025-38153 CVE-2025-38154 CVE-2025-38157 CVE-2025-38158                      CVE-2025-38159 CVE-2025-38160 CVE-2025-38161 CVE-2025-38163                      CVE-2025-38165 CVE-2025-38166 CVE-2025-38167 CVE-2025-38170                      CVE-2025-38173 CVE-2025-38174 CVE-2025-38180 CVE-2025-38181                      CVE-2025-38183 CVE-2025-38184 CVE-2025-38185 CVE-2025-38190                      CVE-2025-38191 CVE-2025-38193 CVE-2025-38194 CVE-2025-38197                      CVE-2025-38198 CVE-2025-38200 CVE-2025-38202 CVE-2025-38211                      CVE-2025-38212 CVE-2025-38214 CVE-2025-38215 CVE-2025-38218                      CVE-2025-38219 CVE-2025-38222 CVE-2025-38225 CVE-2025-38226                      CVE-2025-38227 CVE-2025-38229 CVE-2025-38230 CVE-2025-38231                      CVE-2025-38236 CVE-2025-38239 CVE-2025-38245 CVE-2025-38249                      CVE-2025-38251 CVE-2025-38257 CVE-2025-38259 CVE-2025-38260                      CVE-2025-38262 CVE-2025-38263 CVE-2025-38273 CVE-2025-38275                      CVE-2025-38277 CVE-2025-38280 CVE-2025-38282 CVE-2025-38285                      CVE-2025-38286 CVE-2025-38293 CVE-2025-38298 CVE-2025-38300                      CVE-2025-38304 CVE-2025-38305 CVE-2025-38310 CVE-2025-38312                      CVE-2025-38313 CVE-2025-38319 CVE-2025-38320 CVE-2025-38323                      CVE-2025-38324 CVE-2025-38326 CVE-2025-38328 CVE-2025-38331                      CVE-2025-38332 CVE-2025-38334 CVE-2025-38336 CVE-2025-38337                      CVE-2025-38342 CVE-2025-38344 CVE-2025-38345 CVE-2025-38346                      CVE-2025-38348 CVE-2025-38350 CVE-2025-38352 CVE-2025-38354                      CVE-2025-38362 CVE-2025-38363 CVE-2025-38364 CVE-2025-38365                      CVE-2025-38371 CVE-2025-38375 CVE-2025-38377 CVE-2025-38380                      CVE-2025-38382 CVE-2025-38384 CVE-2025-38385 CVE-2025-38386                      CVE-2025-38387 CVE-2025-38389 CVE-2025-38391 CVE-2025-38393                      CVE-2025-38395 CVE-2025-38396 CVE-2025-38399 CVE-2025-38400                      CVE-2025-38401 CVE-2025-38403 CVE-2025-38404 CVE-2025-38406                      CVE-2025-38409 CVE-2025-38410 CVE-2025-38412 CVE-2025-38415                      CVE-2025-38416 CVE-2025-38418 CVE-2025-38419 CVE-2025-38420                      CVE-2025-38422 CVE-2025-38424 CVE-2025-38425 CVE-2025-38428                      CVE-2025-38430 CVE-2025-38437 CVE-2025-38439 CVE-2025-38441                      CVE-2025-38443 CVE-2025-38444 CVE-2025-38445 CVE-2025-38448                      CVE-2025-38451 CVE-2025-38455 CVE-2025-38456 CVE-2025-38457                      CVE-2025-38458 CVE-2025-38459 CVE-2025-38460 CVE-2025-38461                      CVE-2025-38462 CVE-2025-38464 CVE-2025-38465 CVE-2025-38466                      CVE-2025-38467 CVE-2025-38468 CVE-2025-38470 CVE-2025-38471                      CVE-2025-38472 CVE-2025-38473 CVE-2025-38474 CVE-2025-38476                      CVE-2025-38477 CVE-2025-38478 CVE-2025-38480 CVE-2025-38481                      CVE-2025-38482 CVE-2025-38483 CVE-2025-38485 CVE-2025-38487                      CVE-2025-38488 CVE-2025-38494 CVE-2025-38495 CVE-2025-38497                      CVE-2025-38498 CVE-2025-38499

    Several vulnerabilities have been discovered in the Linux kernel that     may lead to a privilege escalation, denial of service or information     leaks.

    For the oldstable distribution (bookworm), these problems have been fixed     in version 6.1.147-1.

    We recommend that you upgrade your linux packages.

    For the detailed security status of linux please refer to its security     tracker page at:
    https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/linux

    Further information about Debian Security Advisories, how to apply     these updates to your system and frequently asked questions can be     found at: https://www.debian.org/security/

    Mailing list: debian-security-announce@lists.debian.org

Tenable has extracted the preceding description block directly from the Debian security advisory.

Note that Nessus has not tested for these issues but has instead relied only on the application's self-reported version number.

The Linux/Unix host has one or more packages installed that are impacted by a vulnerability without a vendor supplied patch available.

  - jffs2: check that raw node were preallocated before writing summary Syzkaller detected a kernel bug in     jffs2_link_node_ref, caused by fault injection in jffs2_prealloc_raw_node_refs. jffs2_sum_write_sumnode     doesn't check return value of jffs2_prealloc_raw_node_refs and simply lets any error propagate into     jffs2_sum_write_data, which eventually calls jffs2_link_node_ref in order to link the summary to an     expectedly allocated node. kernel BUG at fs/jffs2/nodelist.c:592! invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP     KASAN NOPTI CPU: 1 PID: 31277 Comm: syz-executor.7 Not tainted 6.1.128-syzkaller-00139-ge10f83ca10a1 #0     Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.12.0-1 04/01/2014 RIP:
    0010:jffs2_link_node_ref+0x570/0x690 fs/jffs2/nodelist.c:592 Call Trace: <TASK> jffs2_sum_write_data     fs/jffs2/summary.c:841 [inline] jffs2_sum_write_sumnode+0xd1a/0x1da0 fs/jffs2/summary.c:874     jffs2_do_reserve_space+0xa18/0xd60 fs/jffs2/nodemgmt.c:388 jffs2_reserve_space+0x55f/0xaa0     fs/jffs2/nodemgmt.c:197 jffs2_write_inode_range+0x246/0xb50 fs/jffs2/write.c:362     jffs2_write_end+0x726/0x15d0 fs/jffs2/file.c:301 generic_perform_write+0x314/0x5d0 mm/filemap.c:3856
    __generic_file_write_iter+0x2ae/0x4d0 mm/filemap.c:3973 generic_file_write_iter+0xe3/0x350     mm/filemap.c:4005 call_write_iter include/linux/fs.h:2265 [inline] do_iter_readv_writev+0x20f/0x3c0     fs/read_write.c:735 do_iter_write+0x186/0x710 fs/read_write.c:861 vfs_iter_write+0x70/0xa0     fs/read_write.c:902 iter_file_splice_write+0x73b/0xc90 fs/splice.c:685 do_splice_from fs/splice.c:763     [inline] direct_splice_actor+0x10c/0x170 fs/splice.c:950 splice_direct_to_actor+0x337/0xa10     fs/splice.c:896 do_splice_direct+0x1a9/0x280 fs/splice.c:1002 do_sendfile+0xb13/0x12c0     fs/read_write.c:1255 __do_sys_sendfile64 fs/read_write.c:1323 [inline] __se_sys_sendfile64     fs/read_write.c:1309 [inline] __x64_sys_sendfile64+0x1cf/0x210 fs/read_write.c:1309 do_syscall_x64     arch/x86/entry/common.c:51 [inline] do_syscall_64+0x35/0x80 arch/x86/entry/common.c:81     entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x6e/0xd8 Fix this issue by checking return value of     jffs2_prealloc_raw_node_refs before calling jffs2_sum_write_data. Found by Linux Verification Center     (linuxtesting.org) with Syzkaller. (CVE-2025-38194)

Note that Nessus relies on the presence of the package as reported by the vendor.

远程 Debian 12 主机上存在安装的程序包该程序包受到 dsa-5973 公告中提及的多个漏洞的影响。

    - ------------------------------------------------- ------------------------ Debian 安全公告 DSA-5973-1 security@debian.org https://www.debian.org/security/Salvatore Bonaccorso 2025 年 8 月 12 日 https://www.debian.org/security/faq
    - -------------------------------------------------------------------------

    程序包：linux CVE ID：CVE-2024-36350 CVE-2024-36357 CVE-2024-36913 CVE-2024-41013 CVE-2024-56758 CVE-2024-57883 CVE-2025-21816 CVE-2025-22119 CVE-2025-27558 CVE-2025-37958 CVE-2025-38000 CVE-2025-38001 CVE-2025-38003 CVE-2025-38004 CVE-2025-38031 CVE-2025-38034 CVE-2025-38035 CVE-2025-38037 CVE-2025-38040 CVE-2025-38043 CVE-2025-38044 CVE-2025-38048 CVE-2025-38051 CVE-2025-38052 CVE-2025-38058 CVE-2025-38061 CVE-2025-38062 CVE-2025-38063 CVE-2025-38065 CVE-2025-38066 CVE-2025-38067 CVE-2025-38068 CVE-2025-38071 CVE-2025-38072 CVE-2025-38074 CVE-2025-38075 CVE-2025-38077 CVE-2025-38078 CVE-2025-38079 CVE-2025-38083 CVE-2025-38084 CVE-2025-38085 CVE-2025-38086 CVE-2025-38088 CVE-2025-38090 CVE-2025-38097 CVE-2025-38100 CVE-2025-38102 CVE-2025-38103 CVE-2025-38107 CVE-2025-38108 CVE-2025-38111 CVE-2025-38112 CVE-2025-38113 CVE-2025-38115 CVE-2025-38118 CVE-2025-38119 CVE-2025-38120 CVE-2025-38122 CVE-2025-38124 CVE-2025-38126 CVE-2025-38131 CVE-2025-38135 CVE-2025-38136 CVE-2025-38138 CVE-2025-38142 CVE-2025-38143 CVE-2025-38145 CVE-2025-38146 CVE-2025-38147 CVE-2025-38148 CVE-2025-38151 CVE-2025-38153 CVE-2025-38154 CVE-2025-38157 CVE-2025-38158 CVE-2025-38159 CVE-2025-38160 CVE-2025-38161 CVE-2025-38163 CVE-2025-38165 CVE-2025-38166 CVE-2025-38167 CVE-2025-38170 CVE-2025-38173 CVE-2025-38174 CVE-2025-38180 CVE-2025-38181 CVE-2025-38183 CVE-2025-38184 CVE-2025-38185 CVE-2025-38190 CVE-2025-38191 CVE-2025-38193 CVE-2025-38194 CVE-2025-38197 CVE-2025-38198 CVE-2025-38200 CVE-2025-38202 CVE-2025-38211 CVE-2025-38212 CVE-2025-38214 CVE-2025-38215 CVE-2025-38218 CVE-2025-38219 CVE-2025-38222 CVE-2025-38225 CVE-2025-38226 CVE-2025-38227 CVE-2025-38229 CVE-2025-38230 CVE-2025-38231 CVE-2025-38236 CVE-2025-38239 CVE-2025-38245 CVE-2025-38249 CVE-2025-38251 CVE-2025-38257 CVE-2025-38259 CVE-2025-38260 CVE-2025-38262 CVE-2025-38263 CVE-2025-38273 CVE-2025-38275 CVE-2025-38277 CVE-2025-38280 CVE-2025-38282 CVE-2025-38285 CVE-2025-38286 CVE-2025-38293 CVE-2025-38298 CVE-2025-38300 CVE-2025-38304 CVE-2025-38305 CVE-2025-38310 CVE-2025-38312 CVE-2025-38313 CVE-2025-38319 CVE-2025-38320 CVE-2025-38323 CVE-2025-38324 CVE-2025-38326 CVE-2025-38328 CVE-2025-38331 CVE-2025-38332 CVE-2025-38334 CVE-2025-38336 CVE-2025-38337 CVE-2025-38342 CVE-2025-38344 CVE-2025-38345 CVE-2025-38346 CVE-2025-38348 CVE-2025-38350 CVE-2025-38352 CVE-2025-38354 CVE-2025-38362 CVE-2025-38363 CVE-2025-38364 CVE-2025-38365 CVE-2025-38371 CVE-2025-38375 CVE-2025-38377 CVE-2025-38380 CVE-2025-38382 CVE-2025-38384 CVE-2025-38385 CVE-2025-38386 CVE-2025-38387 CVE-2025-38389 CVE-2025-38391 CVE-2025-38393 CVE-2025-38395 CVE-2025-38396 CVE-2025-38399 CVE-2025-38400 CVE-2025-38401 CVE-2025-38403 CVE-2025-38404 CVE-2025-38406 CVE-2025-38409 CVE-2025-38410 CVE-2025-38412 CVE-2025-38415 CVE-2025-38416 CVE-2025-38418 CVE-2025-38419 CVE-2025-38420 CVE-2025-38422 CVE-2025-38424 CVE-2025-38425 CVE-2025-38428 CVE-2025-38430 CVE-2025-38437 CVE-2025-38439 CVE-2025-38441 CVE-2025-38443 CVE-2025-38444 CVE-2025-38445 CVE-2025-38448 CVE-2025-38451 CVE-2025-38455 CVE-2025-38456 CVE-2025-38457 CVE-2025-38458 CVE-2025-38459 CVE-2025-38460 CVE-2025-38461 CVE-2025-38462 CVE-2025-38464 CVE-2025-38465 CVE-2025-38466 CVE-2025-38467 CVE-2025-38468 CVE-2025-38470 CVE-2025-38471 CVE-2025-38472 CVE-2025-38473 CVE-2025-38474 CVE-2025-38476 CVE-2025-38477 CVE-2025-38478 CVE-2025-38480 CVE-2025-38481 CVE-2025-38482 CVE-2025-38483 CVE-2025-38485 CVE-2025-38487 CVE-2025-38488 CVE-2025-38494 CVE-2025-38495 CVE-2025-38497 CVE-2025-38498 CVE-2025-38499

    在 Linux 内核中发现多个可能导致权限升级、拒绝服务或信息泄漏的漏洞。

    对于旧稳定发行版本 (bookbird)这些问题已在版本 6.1.147-1中修复。

    建议您升级 linux 程序包。

    如需了解 linux 的详细安全状态，请参阅其安全跟踪页面：
    https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/linux

    有关 Debian 安全公告、如何将这些更新应用到系统以及常见问题解答的更多信息，请访问以下网址：https://www.debian.org/security/

    邮件列表：debian-security-announce@lists.debian.org

Tenable 已直接从 Debian 安全公告中提取上述描述块。

请注意，Nessus 尚未测试这些问题，而是只依据应用程序自我报告的版本号进行判断。

遠端 Debian 12 主機已安裝受到多個弱點影響的套件如 dsa-5973 公告中所提及。

    - ------------------------------------------------- ------------------------ Debian 安全性公告 DSA-5973-1 security@debian.org https://www.debian.org/security/Salvatore Bonaccorso 2025 年 8 月 12 日 https://www.debian.org/security/faq
    - -------------------------------------------------------------------------

    套件：linux CVE ID：CVE-2024-36350 CVE-2024-36357 CVE-2024-36913 CVE-2024-41013 CVE-2024-56758 CVE-2024-57883 CVE-2025-21816 CVE-2025-22119 CVE-2025-27558 CVE-2025-37958 CVE-2025-38000 CVE-2025-38001 CVE-2025-38003 CVE-2025-38004 CVE-2025-38031 CVE-2025-38034 CVE-2025-38035 CVE-2025-38037 CVE-2025-38040 CVE-2025-38043 CVE-2025-38044 CVE-2025-38048 CVE-2025-38051 CVE-2025-38052 CVE-2025-38058 CVE-2025-38061 CVE-2025-38062 CVE-2025-38063 CVE-2025-38065 CVE-2025-38066 CVE-2025-38067 CVE-2025-38068 CVE-2025-38071 CVE-2025-38072 CVE-2025-38074 CVE-2025-38075 CVE-2025-38077 CVE-2025-38078 CVE-2025-38079 CVE-2025-38083 CVE-2025-38084 CVE-2025-38085 CVE-2025-38086 CVE-2025-38088 CVE-2025-38090 CVE-2025-38097 CVE-2025-38100 CVE-2025-38102 CVE-2025-38103 CVE-2025-38107 CVE-2025-38108 CVE-2025-38111 CVE-2025-38112 CVE-2025-38113 CVE-2025-38115 CVE-2025-38118 CVE-2025-38119 CVE-2025-38120 CVE-2025-38122 CVE-2025-38124 CVE-2025-38126 CVE-2025-38131 CVE-2025-38135 CVE-2025-38136 CVE-2025-38138 CVE-2025-38142 CVE-2025-38143 CVE-2025-38145 CVE-2025-38146 CVE-2025-38147 CVE-2025-38148 CVE-2025-38151 CVE-2025-38153 CVE-2025-38154 CVE-2025-38157 CVE-2025-38158 CVE-2025-38159 CVE-2025-38160 CVE-2025-38161 CVE-2025-38163 CVE-2025-38165 CVE-2025-38166 CVE-2025-38167 CVE-2025-38170 CVE-2025-38173 CVE-2025-38174 CVE-2025-38180 CVE-2025-38181 CVE-2025-38183 CVE-2025-38184 CVE-2025-38185 CVE-2025-38190 CVE-2025-38191 CVE-2025-38193 CVE-2025-38194 CVE-2025-38197 CVE-2025-38198 CVE-2025-38200 CVE-2025-38202 CVE-2025-38211 CVE-2025-38212 CVE-2025-38214 CVE-2025-38215 CVE-2025-38218 CVE-2025-38219 CVE-2025-38222 CVE-2025-38225 CVE-2025-38226 CVE-2025-38227 CVE-2025-38229 CVE-2025-38230 CVE-2025-38231 CVE-2025-38236 CVE-2025-38239 CVE-2025-38245 CVE-2025-38249 CVE-2025-38251 CVE-2025-38257 CVE-2025-38259 CVE-2025-38260 CVE-2025-38262 CVE-2025-38263 CVE-2025-38273 CVE-2025-38275 CVE-2025-38277 CVE-2025-38280 CVE-2025-38282 CVE-2025-38285 CVE-2025-38286 CVE-2025-38293 CVE-2025-38298 CVE-2025-38300 CVE-2025-38304 CVE-2025-38305 CVE-2025-38310 CVE-2025-38312 CVE-2025-38313 CVE-2025-38319 CVE-2025-38320 CVE-2025-38323 CVE-2025-38324 CVE-2025-38326 CVE-2025-38328 CVE-2025-38331 CVE-2025-38332 CVE-2025-38334 CVE-2025-38336 CVE-2025-38337 CVE-2025-38342 CVE-2025-38344 CVE-2025-38345 CVE-2025-38346 CVE-2025-38348 CVE-2025-38350 CVE-2025-38352 CVE-2025-38354 CVE-2025-38362 CVE-2025-38363 CVE-2025-38364 CVE-2025-38365 CVE-2025-38371 CVE-2025-38375 CVE-2025-38377 CVE-2025-38380 CVE-2025-38382 CVE-2025-38384 CVE-2025-38385 CVE-2025-38386 CVE-2025-38387 CVE-2025-38389 CVE-2025-38391 CVE-2025-38393 CVE-2025-38395 CVE-2025-38396 CVE-2025-38399 CVE-2025-38400 CVE-2025-38401 CVE-2025-38403 CVE-2025-38404 CVE-2025-38406 CVE-2025-38409 CVE-2025-38410 CVE-2025-38412 CVE-2025-38415 CVE-2025-38416 CVE-2025-38418 CVE-2025-38419 CVE-2025-38420 CVE-2025-38422 CVE-2025-38424 CVE-2025-38425 CVE-2025-38428 CVE-2025-38430 CVE-2025-38437 CVE-2025-38439 CVE-2025-38441 CVE-2025-38443 CVE-2025-38444 CVE-2025-38445 CVE-2025-38448 CVE-2025-38451 CVE-2025-38455 CVE-2025-38456 CVE-2025-38457 CVE-2025-38458 CVE-2025-38459 CVE-2025-38460 CVE-2025-38461 CVE-2025-38462 CVE-2025-38464 CVE-2025-38465 CVE-2025-38466 CVE-2025-38467 CVE-2025-38468 CVE-2025-38470 CVE-2025-38471 CVE-2025-38472 CVE-2025-38473 CVE-2025-38474 CVE-2025-38476 CVE-2025-38477 CVE-2025-38478 CVE-2025-38480 CVE-2025-38481 CVE-2025-38482 CVE-2025-38483 CVE-2025-38485 CVE-2025-38487 CVE-2025-38488 CVE-2025-38494 CVE-2025-38495 CVE-2025-38497 CVE-2025-38498 CVE-2025-38499

    在 Linux 核心中發現數個弱點，這些弱點可能會導致特權提升、拒絕服務或資訊洩漏。

    針對舊的穩定發行版本 (book蠕蟲)這些問題已在 6.1.147-1版中修正。

    建議您升級 linux 套件。

    如需有關 linux 安全性狀態的詳細資訊，請參閱其安全追蹤頁面：
    https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/linux

    有關 Debian 安全公告、如何將這些更新套用至您的系統以及常見問題的詳細資訊，請參閱：https://www.debian.org/security/

    郵寄清單：debian-security-announce@lists.debian.org

Tenable 已直接從 Debian 安全公告擷取前置描述區塊。

請注意，Nessus 並未測試這些問題，而是僅依據應用程式自我報告的版本號碼作出判斷。

ID	名前	製品	ファミリー	公開日	更新日	深刻度
249177	Debian dsa-5973 : affs-modules-6.1.0-37-4kc-malta-di - セキュリティ更新	Nessus	Debian Local Security Checks	2025/8/13	2025/8/13	medium
248396	Linux Distros 未修补的漏洞：CVE-2025-38194	Nessus	Misc.	2025/8/11	2025/8/11	high
248396	Linux Distros のパッチ未適用の脆弱性: CVE-2025-38194	Nessus	Misc.	2025/8/11	2025/8/11	high
248396	Linux Distros 未修補的弱點：CVE-2025-38194	Nessus	Misc.	2025/8/11	2025/8/11	high
249177	Debian dsa-5973 : affs-modules-6.1.0-37-4kc-malta-di - security update	Nessus	Debian Local Security Checks	2025/8/13	2025/8/13	medium
248396	Linux Distros Unpatched Vulnerability : CVE-2025-38194	Nessus	Misc.	2025/8/11	2025/8/11	high
249177	Debian dsa-5973affs-modules-6.1.0-37-4kc-malta-di - 安全更新	Nessus	Debian Local Security Checks	2025/8/13	2025/8/13	medium
249177	Debian dsa-5973affs-modules-6.1.0-37-4kc-malta-di - 安全性更新	Nessus	Debian Local Security Checks	2025/8/13	2025/8/13	medium

検出

プラグインの検索

medium

high

high

high

medium

high

medium

medium